mlcastle

  

laughterkey:

image

All my binheads know what’s good.

How to remove a CDK resource referenced across stacks

Suppose you have a stack A which contains some resource used by stack B, and that you no longer need this resource. Here is how you can get rid of it:

  1. Remove all uses of the resource from stack B. In stack A, force the resource to continue being exported by writing

    this.exportValue(this.resource.property);
    
  2. Deploy.

  3. Now, and only now, you can safely remove the resource (and associated export) from stack A.

  4. Deploy again.

That’s it!

I gave a talk at Droidcon NYC this year about our experiences using React Native to build and launch a new mobile app in just a few months.

a selected list of things you can buy in the international terminal of Bogotá airport

  1. Juan Valdez brand coffee
  2. A mug saying (in English) “It’s Colombia, not Columbia”
  3. Columbia Sportswear brand clothing

“Smash the State: an introduction to functional programming and the actor model” is an article that somebody really ought to have written by now.

poison-liker:
“ god. everything about this. the misplaced eye. the gradient abuse. the fucked up mouth-neck zone. the misproportioned head. the lumpy legstumps. the poorly tessellated shell.
this smug piece of shit killed my son and now it’s taunting...

poison-liker:

god. everything about this. the misplaced eye. the gradient abuse. the fucked up mouth-neck zone. the misproportioned head. the lumpy legstumps. the poorly tessellated shell.

this smug piece of shit killed my son and now it’s taunting me. i hate it.

Dark times are indeed afoot for the Google emoji animals. Quite a fall in the official rankings.

The New York Times is known to moderate the comments on their website, requiring human moderators to individually approve each comment before it is posted. And, according to an individual with knowledge of the comment moderation operations, in addition to spam, profanity, and ad hominem attacks, the Times prohibits spreading conspiracy theories. So, like, you can’t rant that the news of the day was actually secretly created by the illuminati. Fine.

But! There’s a problem now: our President-elect is busy spinning conspiracy theories. And it would be unfair to prohibit commenters from spreading the theories that the soon-to-be-President spreads.

Apparently, the Times’ editors decided then to give the President a magical power where he can admit nonsense theories into the permitted discourse. So, you’re allowed now in the comment sections to say that three million undocumented immigrants voted in the election, if that’s a thing that for some reason you want to say. But, the editors also decided, you’re not allowed to present any evidence for these theories, because there isn’t any evidence, because the theories are totally made-up. So, you’re not allowed to say, for example, that you saw three million undocumented immigrants go to the polls, because you didn’t.

Welcome to America in 2017, everybody.

fuckyeahanarchistcats:
“Bite back
”

fuckyeahanarchistcats:

Bite back